Myths & decisions
Common assumptions, decision helpers and what actually matters.
All questions
3 questionsShould I mix it myself or hire someone?
That's really your call. If you want to learn the craft, mixing it yourself is one way to go: you get better with every mix. But it can also be tough when you're not yet sure how to get your track where you want it.
An experienced mixing engineer brings two things you can't easily get on your own. One is a fresh, outside perspective: someone who comes to your track the way your audience eventually will, while after weeks on a song you lose that. The other is a trained sense of where the song needs to go. That means less trial and error and more deliberate decisions.
In the end, it's a personal decision. If you're unsure, go with what feels right for you and your music. A professional mix is, above all, an investment in the result.
Is AI mastering good enough?
Here's the catch with AI mastering: it learns from thousands of finished tracks and then nudges whatever you feed it toward that learned average. Your song was never part of what it learned from, so it can only aim at a general target — not the specific calls your track actually needs. Something like iZotope Ozone has been around for years and genuinely has its place: a starting point, a quick way to hear a direction. Real mastering, though, it isn't.
Is mastering worth it for a single track?
Yes, it can be worth it. Honestly, almost every release gets mastered — so mastering is the norm rather than the exception, even for a single track. The real question isn't so much whether it's worth it for one single, but whether you have it mastered at all. A master gets the most out of a good mix and gives your track the professional finish it needs for release: a fresh, outside perspective and a final technical check, which is often overlooked. Whether it's worth it for you is your call. Especially if you're unsure, it's worth considering.
Related topics
Don't see your question? Ask us: Contact page